Archive | Ideas

Big Society: Creating Social Energy

Tom Tolchard; SiiWA Project Director discussing his recent trip back to the UK and some observations about some of the changes taking place there. 

I recently headed back to the UK for a few weeks. I tend to have mixed emotions every time I go back. I’ve only headed home three times in the past ten years, I have to say that I wasn’t exactly in love with England when I left for Australia, it seemed too expensive, too aggressive, too little opportunity but each time I go back I notice all the great aspects life in the UK and inevitably find myself daydreaming about what life would be like if I returned. I imagine living in the leafy suburbs, playing village cricket at the weekends, drinking warm beer and complaining endlessly about, well anything really. This thought never lasts long but it was enough to start me thinking about the state of the UK and how it’s people and government are addressing the considerable social issues, which have arisen over recent years.

During my first week back in England the government released a frightening new statistic that made me consider just how important the need is for effective social innovation thinking. Having conducted a 6 month long, national survey the UK government we’re embarrassed to report that the number of children now living below the poverty line had increased from 1:5 to a staggering 1:4. That’s one in four school children in England going to school with no breakfast in their tummies, living in houses without adequate heating, wearing school clothes that don’t fit etc…. That was the same week the government rather quietly announced the need to down grade the UK economic forecast by an additional 7% (on top of the 5 % down grade three months prior). This wasn’t quite what I’d expected to find in my old country.

In a nut shell things were bad, as someone looking from the outside in, there doesn’t seem to be a lot of understanding from the people as to how the UK citizens are collectively going to address these social ills. Some may suggest that the recent rioting and the social unrest that we have witnessed to be a byproduct of this rather gloomy reality. I have very little insight these days into the social fabric of life in England but one thing that resonates for me is that many people believe that it is “the absence of hope for many young people in England” that is manifesting itself into dysfunctional and destructive behavior (or as my good friend put it to me recently “who’s country is full of convicts now Tom?”). How does a country build hope for hundreds of thousands of disenfranchised residents and do it in a way, which does not displace the happy folk, buggered if I know but I’d love to have a go at working out some solutions?

It was with these lofty questions and concerns in mind that I decided to go and find out what the Big Society mob were up to and how if at all they were planning on stopping the rot. For those who are new to Big Society I’ll provide a quick introduction. Big Society was launched by the UK government in 2010 to act as a think tank and ideas center for bringing about positive social change. “Our aim is to champion people and organisations that are part of social change. We are a catalyst creating partnerships for the wider society and are open to everyone” (www.thebigsociety.co.uk). The thing I like about Big Society is that it is thinking on a large scale, its see’s this social unrest as an opportunity to drive best practice in social enterprise, develop scalable, exportable models and their aim is to be regarded as global “best in show” at delivering innovative social capital but by their own admission they have one hell of a long journey ahead of them.

I caught up with a representative of Big Society in Manchester and asked her to explain some of the projects she was working on. One of the Big Society projects she showed me around focused on re-energising the high street and CBD retail strips.

The City of Manchester has initiated a project where it is subsidizing 50% of the rental costs of un-occupied, prime high street locations (mainly vacant due to the huge number of independent retails who have gone out of business over the past two years as well as the consolidation of many retail chains) for new start up social enterprises which encourage skills acquisition, training and employment opportunities for long term unemployed. This means that socially driven organisations, which seek to trade in order to sustain themselves, stand along side the likes of Tesco, Top Shop and Marks and Spencer but also ensure that property which has high trading potential is utilized rather that sitting vacant.

The high street has been seen as a social focal point for centuries and there is evidence linking the deterioration of high street communities to a direct correlation in dysfunctional behavior. By taking an empty retail space (which is a symbol of failure in the community) and turning it into a supported and subsidized social venture it becomes an asset to the community. This is just one example of how Big Society are throwing out the rule book and using social innovation create hope for people in England.

So what can we the residents of Western Australia learn from the Big Society initiative, a few suggestions I’ve been mulling over include the following. It would be benificial for all to create social welfare systems designed with and not for the disadvantaged people of Perth, empowering and including them as our primary stakeholder. Perth could also seek to use some of the hundreds of thousands of square meters of vacant prime CBD real estate to facilitate the rise of new social enterprise and hybrid models (a project that City of Perth has started to map vacant spaces in the CBD). I’d also like to champion the emergence of commercial social investment, in the USA the socially responsible investment market is now valued at $3.07 trillion. Its important for us to shift our thinking away from subsidiary or loss making social investment to a belief that social investment can produce positive returns both in economic and social measures.

Big Society thinking was reinforces the view that its often the guy on the street that is close to the real issues and who has huge value to add when designing social solutions. It’s also a great example of hand up not hand out where risk is shared but equally so are the rewards. For more info and a nosey through their work check out www.thebigsociety.co.uk

Posted in Articles, Ideas, NewsView Comments

Spacecubed: Co-working, Collaboration and Innovation

Spacecubed - Co-working, Collaboration and Innovation in Perth Things are really starting to move on the Co-working, Collaboration and Innovation space that SiiWA is building in collaboration with a growing list of partners at 45 St Georges Terrace now called Spacecubed. Read the full story

Posted in Featured, Ideas, News, Projects, SpacecubedView Comments

Microenterprise development in remote WA communities

ELPEnterprise Learning Projects (ELP) provides a first point of contact for individuals and communities wanting to engage in microenterprise development. From the seed of an idea to piloting and facilitating specialist support, ELP works with individuals and communities to bring their ideas to life. The tailored process they go through with the community helps ensure businesses and the people running them are sustainable and able to grow.

“We continue to be inspired meeting many Aboriginal people and communities who have aspirations to start their own business. People tell us that one of the biggest barriers they face is accessing the support they need to develop their ideas into real life ventures. We are responding to this need by creating opportunities for remote communities throughout Australia to access relevant and culturally appropriate business development training and support”.

ELP was recently awarded a grant from the WA Social Innovation Fund to support and foster microenterprise development in the Ngaanyatjarra Lands. Over the next 12 months, ELP will work with individuals and groups who have business ideas they would like to explore and develop.

Yarralin Op ShopELP is currently partnering with The Smith Family Katherine as part of the Australian Government’s Communities for Children Initiative. Working with the community of Yarralin, they are supporting individuals to pilot a range of business ideas. Here are just a couple:

Photography/photo printing business
Yarralin now has its very own photography business! Called ‘Natural Photos’ and run by Sharantine and Jessica Campbell, the business takes portraits, family photos and landscape pictures, as well as providing a photo printing service for community members. Sharantine and Jessica are demonstrating to the wider community that you can make money by doing what you love to do – in their case, photography.

Op Shop
In Yarralin community, four hours from Katherine, affordable clothes used to be hard to come by. The range at the local community store was limited and expensive so the women of Yarralin, with assistance from ELP, established a community op shop. ELP helped to broker a relationship with Vinnies op shop in Katherine and they provided the first load of stock free of charge to enable the women to raise some capital. After the sale of these goods, the women negotiated a commercial arrangement with Vinnies, paying $100 for new stock each fortnight. The women have learnt basic account keeping skills to keep track of the money coming in and going out of the business and are building up the business so it can keep going into the future. When asked about the op shop, Connie replied ‘I like doing the selling. It’s good. Things are happening now. It’s good for the community.’

Link to website: www.elp.org.au

Enterprise Learning Projects

Posted in Ideas, News, Programs, ResourcesView Comments

Co-creation in action for Perth co-working, collaboraiton and innovation space

Read the full story

Posted in Featured, Ideas, News, Projects, Spacecubed, SpacesView Comments

Guest Post: Community Sector is a Dirty Job

I was invited to sit in a staff meeting of a large non-profit organisation heavily funded by the federal government working on building communities and bridging gaps in the community. I spent about an hour talking to them about what I do and my beliefs as well as answering all their questions.

One of the leaders of the organisations mentioned something along the lines of, “Young people like you can get things done rather easily and quickly, but for old people like us, we need structures so all this talk about innovation isn’t going to work for us”. What she said later was what infuriated me. In her words, “We can talk about being creative and innovative in solving social issues, but we have obligations to the government. For example, this morning, while I was driving here, I was thinking about all these really creative stuff I could do for but then I had to stop because I have to think about all these reporting I gotta do”.

Of course, at this point, I had a go at her quite diplomatically. I think many people forget that community organisation exists because of community needs, and at the end of the day, that is what we’re for – not the money. I do know that we need to be talking about practicality and all that but at the end of the day, we need to understand the real role of a community organisation.

Creative and innovation solutions and funding obligations are mutually exclusive. As community organisations fight for funding, more and more organisations change their structure, their programs, their work – the way they think and the way they work in order to fulfill the funding requirements and get the money. It’s a shame because we think that its OK but if these funders know what they’re talking about or what you do – the community sector wouldn’t have existed.

It frustrates me because when I told this to a few of my friends, there are conflicting views and although I see both side of the story, I really do not believe that community sector should be focusing on capital and money, because we were born out of altruism, love and care. I know that its hard to get things done without money, but if money determines how we response to social issues, we’re quite doomed because we will always have boundaries to the way we do things.

I really encourage people and executives to bring back the core of community organisations – voice your disagreements when something isn’t right. Don’t fall for the money because if it doesn’t align with your values and the real purpose of your existence, they are dirty money and you should be impolite and be daring to voice your opinions and encourage them to change their guidelines.

Although funding guidelines are needed, we as community sector need to keep these guidelines informed, relevant and actually beneficial – not just adapt ourselves. There’s just so much we could adapt, and the more we adapt to what others want us to be good at, the less we are going to progress because the people who caused these issues will be the one guiding us in the end.

About the Author

Ehon Chan is a researcher, thinker, teacher, change agent. He is Director of Research for YES Brisbane, a Youth Ambassador for the Inspire Foundation, Advisory Board member for PlanBig, co-author for Digital For Good and last but not least a research Officer for Project Australia.

You can follow Ehon’s progress on his Blog and contact him via email or Twitter.

Posted in Articles, Ideas, News, ResourcesView Comments


SiiWA’s Purpose

Support entrepreneurs, communities, and business to deliver social good through innovative means.


You can find out more about us and our plans here.

Subscribe to our updates